<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 512 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205978</link>
    <description>Wrongful availment of Modvat/Cenvat credit on inputs used in exempted and dutiable goods justified recovery after retrospective amendment, but penalty could not be imposed retrospectively because it is penal in character. The assessee had reversed the credit when pointed out and had substantially paid the duty before the order-in-original, with the balance paid within the stipulated time. On those facts, the amended interest provision did not apply, as interest was chargeable only where the amount found due remained unpaid within the time fixed in the order. Penalty was therefore set aside and no interest was leviable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 512 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205978</link>
      <description>Wrongful availment of Modvat/Cenvat credit on inputs used in exempted and dutiable goods justified recovery after retrospective amendment, but penalty could not be imposed retrospectively because it is penal in character. The assessee had reversed the credit when pointed out and had substantially paid the duty before the order-in-original, with the balance paid within the stipulated time. On those facts, the amended interest provision did not apply, as interest was chargeable only where the amount found due remained unpaid within the time fixed in the order. Penalty was therefore set aside and no interest was leviable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>