<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 672 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205970</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a statutory body, holding that its income was not taxable as business income under Section 11(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the activities were charitable in nature and for public benefit, exempting them from taxation. Additionally, various amounts, including premium prices on leases and deposits obtained, were not considered as business income as they were utilized for charitable purposes. The Tribunal also reversed disallowances under Section 43B, stating that since the income was exempt, the disallowances were unnecessary. The subsidies received were deemed non-taxable as they were not for the assessee&#039;s free use.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 672 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205970</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a statutory body, holding that its income was not taxable as business income under Section 11(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the activities were charitable in nature and for public benefit, exempting them from taxation. Additionally, various amounts, including premium prices on leases and deposits obtained, were not considered as business income as they were utilized for charitable purposes. The Tribunal also reversed disallowances under Section 43B, stating that since the income was exempt, the disallowances were unnecessary. The subsidies received were deemed non-taxable as they were not for the assessee&#039;s free use.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>