<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 668 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in the case, confirming the confiscation of goods under Section 111(d) and (m) of the Customs Act, as well as the confiscation of specific items under Section 111(l). Additionally, the denial of the Zero Duty EPCG Scheme benefit and the imposition of redemption fines and penalties were upheld. The appeals brought by the appellants were consequently dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 668 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in the case, confirming the confiscation of goods under Section 111(d) and (m) of the Customs Act, as well as the confiscation of specific items under Section 111(l). Additionally, the denial of the Zero Duty EPCG Scheme benefit and the imposition of redemption fines and penalties were upheld. The appeals brought by the appellants were consequently dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>