<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 310 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205952</link>
    <description>The Court held that tips collected and paid to employees constituted &quot;profits in lieu of salary&quot; under the Income Tax Act. While the assessees were obligated to deduct tax at source on tips, their bonafide belief that tips were not part of salary exempted them from penalties under Section 201. However, they were liable to pay interest under Section 201(1A) for the delayed tax deduction. The Court ruled in favor of the assessees, allowing the appeals without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 310 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205952</link>
      <description>The Court held that tips collected and paid to employees constituted &quot;profits in lieu of salary&quot; under the Income Tax Act. While the assessees were obligated to deduct tax at source on tips, their bonafide belief that tips were not part of salary exempted them from penalties under Section 201. However, they were liable to pay interest under Section 201(1A) for the delayed tax deduction. The Court ruled in favor of the assessees, allowing the appeals without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>