<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 504 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and remanded the case to the AO for fresh consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the AO to determine fair rent under section 23(1)(a) and compare it with actual rent received, clarifying that notional interest cannot be included in actual rent under section 23(1)(b). The revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, directing a reassessment based on proper determination of fair rent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 504 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and remanded the case to the AO for fresh consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the AO to determine fair rent under section 23(1)(a) and compare it with actual rent received, clarifying that notional interest cannot be included in actual rent under section 23(1)(b). The revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, directing a reassessment based on proper determination of fair rent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>