<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 461 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the utilization of CENVAT credit for paying service tax on GTA services up to 18-4-2006 but disallowed it for the period beyond. Penalties imposed during the latter period were set aside due to the contentious nature of the issue. The Tribunal disposed of all 50 appeals by setting aside tax demand, interest, and penalties up to 18-4-2006, while penalties for the subsequent period were also annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 461 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the utilization of CENVAT credit for paying service tax on GTA services up to 18-4-2006 but disallowed it for the period beyond. Penalties imposed during the latter period were set aside due to the contentious nature of the issue. The Tribunal disposed of all 50 appeals by setting aside tax demand, interest, and penalties up to 18-4-2006, while penalties for the subsequent period were also annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>