https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205934 The appellant company accepted duty liability, interest, and a 25% penalty on the duty for clandestine removal of fabrics. The waiver of the remaining penalty was sought but deemed unnecessary as all due amounts were paid within the specified time frame. The penalty imposed on the Director under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was upheld due to involvement with offending goods, despite the absence of explicit mention of confiscation in the show cause notice. The penalty of Rs. 10,000 was considered justified. The appeals were rejected based on the outlined discussions and findings in the judgment. en-us Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205934 The appellant company accepted duty liability, interest, and a 25% penalty on the duty for clandestine removal of fabrics. The waiver of the remaining penalty was sought but deemed unnecessary as all due amounts were paid within the specified time frame. The penalty imposed on the Director under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was upheld due to involvement with offending goods, despite the absence of explicit mention of confiscation in the show cause notice. The penalty of Rs. 10,000 was considered justified. The appeals were rejected based on the outlined discussions and findings in the judgment. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205934