<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 577 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205930</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal allegations require corroborative evidence and cannot rest solely on security-register entries, figure mismatches, or assumptions. Bulk protein mix transferred between units for further processing and subsequent duty-paid clearance could not support a duty demand without evidence of excess procurement, electricity use, or clandestine clearance; captive-consumption valuation required the applicable cost-based method rather than pro-rata MRP valuation. Packing materials stored at rented additional premises did not establish diversion or credit misuse merely because a suggested procedure was not followed. Alleged duty-free clearance of sample pouches also failed for lack of evidence that filled pouches left the manufacturing unit. Duty, interest and equivalent penalty were sustained only for Xtra-Mass cleared without payment of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 577 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205930</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal allegations require corroborative evidence and cannot rest solely on security-register entries, figure mismatches, or assumptions. Bulk protein mix transferred between units for further processing and subsequent duty-paid clearance could not support a duty demand without evidence of excess procurement, electricity use, or clandestine clearance; captive-consumption valuation required the applicable cost-based method rather than pro-rata MRP valuation. Packing materials stored at rented additional premises did not establish diversion or credit misuse merely because a suggested procedure was not followed. Alleged duty-free clearance of sample pouches also failed for lack of evidence that filled pouches left the manufacturing unit. Duty, interest and equivalent penalty were sustained only for Xtra-Mass cleared without payment of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>