<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 662 - ITAT, Jaipur</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205923</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under sections 147/148, citing a change in law regarding manufacturing activities. The deduction under section 80-IB was allowed for stone cutting activities. The trading addition was deleted due to lack of procedural compliance. The addition on unexplained sundry creditors was also deleted for lack of evidence. The disallowance of stone cutting expenses was overturned. The tribunal dismissed both parties&#039; appeals, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 662 - ITAT, Jaipur</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205923</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under sections 147/148, citing a change in law regarding manufacturing activities. The deduction under section 80-IB was allowed for stone cutting activities. The trading addition was deleted due to lack of procedural compliance. The addition on unexplained sundry creditors was also deleted for lack of evidence. The disallowance of stone cutting expenses was overturned. The tribunal dismissed both parties&#039; appeals, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>