<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 495 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205917</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the availment of modvat credit for service tax paid on outdoor catering services based on a specific Larger Bench decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments against it. Additionally, it ruled in favor of allowing modvat credit on services provided by a practicing Chartered Accountant, emphasizing the taxpayer&#039;s right to choose service providers. However, the Tribunal limited the eligibility of modvat credit on security services to those directly related to business activities, denying credit for security services at locations like sales offices and residences. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were ultimately rejected in all three issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 495 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205917</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the availment of modvat credit for service tax paid on outdoor catering services based on a specific Larger Bench decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments against it. Additionally, it ruled in favor of allowing modvat credit on services provided by a practicing Chartered Accountant, emphasizing the taxpayer&#039;s right to choose service providers. However, the Tribunal limited the eligibility of modvat credit on security services to those directly related to business activities, denying credit for security services at locations like sales offices and residences. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were ultimately rejected in all three issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>