<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 632 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205914</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with the stay order to deposit Rs. 1.5 Lakhs out of total service tax of Rs. 5,53,367. The appellant, a provider of Security Services, argued being covered under man-power supply services effective from 30-6-2005. The appellant deposited Rs. 35,000 and offered to deposit Rs. 65,000 more, totaling Rs. One lakh. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 65,000 within eight weeks for the appeal to be decided on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 632 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205914</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with the stay order to deposit Rs. 1.5 Lakhs out of total service tax of Rs. 5,53,367. The appellant, a provider of Security Services, argued being covered under man-power supply services effective from 30-6-2005. The appellant deposited Rs. 35,000 and offered to deposit Rs. 65,000 more, totaling Rs. One lakh. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 65,000 within eight weeks for the appeal to be decided on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>