<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 958 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal revoked the license suspension of a Custom House Agent, finding insufficient evidence of active involvement in smuggling despite non-compliance with regulations. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of conclusive proof and undue hardship caused by the prolonged suspension, leading to the decision in favor of the Appellant. However, the Tribunal warned that license revocation could still occur if future evidence of involvement in smuggling emerged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 19:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 958 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal revoked the license suspension of a Custom House Agent, finding insufficient evidence of active involvement in smuggling despite non-compliance with regulations. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of conclusive proof and undue hardship caused by the prolonged suspension, leading to the decision in favor of the Appellant. However, the Tribunal warned that license revocation could still occur if future evidence of involvement in smuggling emerged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>