<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 61 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205902</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the deletion of unexplained investments in jewellery and house property at Pitampura and a godown at Bakoli. The court found that the Assessee provided satisfactory explanations supported by Board instructions, leading to the deletion of the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The valuation variances were within acceptable limits, falling below the threshold for additional taxation, as established by previous judgments. The High Court dismissed challenges to these decisions, affirming the deletions of the unexplained investments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 61 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205902</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the deletion of unexplained investments in jewellery and house property at Pitampura and a godown at Bakoli. The court found that the Assessee provided satisfactory explanations supported by Board instructions, leading to the deletion of the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The valuation variances were within acceptable limits, falling below the threshold for additional taxation, as established by previous judgments. The High Court dismissed challenges to these decisions, affirming the deletions of the unexplained investments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>