https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205895 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting relief to the manufacturers of cement by sanctioning refund claims for Service Tax deposits that were directed by authorities and confirmed by the adjudicating authority but set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal held that refund claims resulting from appellate orders should not be rejected based on limitation, citing precedent judgments. The appellants were successful in challenging the rejection of their refund claims as time-barred, with the Tribunal ruling in their favor. en-us Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205895 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting relief to the manufacturers of cement by sanctioning refund claims for Service Tax deposits that were directed by authorities and confirmed by the adjudicating authority but set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal held that refund claims resulting from appellate orders should not be rejected based on limitation, citing precedent judgments. The appellants were successful in challenging the rejection of their refund claims as time-barred, with the Tribunal ruling in their favor. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205895