https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205892 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, set aside the penalty under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 in the case of S. Raghu v. C. Rangaraju. The penalty was waived due to the assessees' ignorance of service tax liability, protected under section 80. The appeal was successful in overturning the penalty under section 78 but upheld the penalty under section 77. en-us Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205892 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, set aside the penalty under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 in the case of S. Raghu v. C. Rangaraju. The penalty was waived due to the assessees' ignorance of service tax liability, protected under section 80. The appeal was successful in overturning the penalty under section 78 but upheld the penalty under section 77. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205892