<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 955 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205890</link>
    <description>The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed as they contested the reduction of redemption fine and penalty by the Commissioner (Appeals). The case involved the assessment of imported goods without proper documentation, leading to an order enhancing assessable value, confiscation, and fines. The Commissioner (Appeals) reduced the fines based on various factors, which the Revenue challenged. The Tribunal interpreted Section 115 on redemption fine imposition, emphasizing consideration of multiple factors. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, citing importers&#039; nominal profit margin and absence of misdeclaration, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 955 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205890</link>
      <description>The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed as they contested the reduction of redemption fine and penalty by the Commissioner (Appeals). The case involved the assessment of imported goods without proper documentation, leading to an order enhancing assessable value, confiscation, and fines. The Commissioner (Appeals) reduced the fines based on various factors, which the Revenue challenged. The Tribunal interpreted Section 115 on redemption fine imposition, emphasizing consideration of multiple factors. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, citing importers&#039; nominal profit margin and absence of misdeclaration, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>