<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 491 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC as the assessee promptly rectified the mistake by paying the duty and interest without fraudulent intent. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the reduction of mandatory penalty was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 491 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC as the assessee promptly rectified the mistake by paying the duty and interest without fraudulent intent. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the reduction of mandatory penalty was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>