<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 454 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205879</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat computer software expenses as revenue expenditure due to technological advancements, dismissing the appeal filed by the revenue. The judgment emphasized the distinction between capital and revenue expenditure in the context of software development and the evolving nature of technology in the industry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 454 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205879</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat computer software expenses as revenue expenditure due to technological advancements, dismissing the appeal filed by the revenue. The judgment emphasized the distinction between capital and revenue expenditure in the context of software development and the evolving nature of technology in the industry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>