<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 453 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205878</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, affirming the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the cooperative society assessee. The dispute centered on claiming depreciation for new machinery not actively used but kept ready for production. The Tribunal accepted the readiness of machinery based on maintenance records and trial runs, allowing depreciation under Section 32. The High Court upheld this decision, emphasizing that readiness for use sufficed for depreciation, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument against actual utilization for claiming depreciation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 453 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205878</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, affirming the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the cooperative society assessee. The dispute centered on claiming depreciation for new machinery not actively used but kept ready for production. The Tribunal accepted the readiness of machinery based on maintenance records and trial runs, allowing depreciation under Section 32. The High Court upheld this decision, emphasizing that readiness for use sufficed for depreciation, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument against actual utilization for claiming depreciation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>