<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 571 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205868</link>
    <description>The dispute concerned whether the service activities fell within Maintenance or Repair Services or were instead taxable as works contract, and whether Notification No. 12/2003-ST could be claimed if eligibility was established. As the merits were not finally examined and the record required fresh consideration, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration of the taxable classification and the notification claim in accordance with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 571 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205868</link>
      <description>The dispute concerned whether the service activities fell within Maintenance or Repair Services or were instead taxable as works contract, and whether Notification No. 12/2003-ST could be claimed if eligibility was established. As the merits were not finally examined and the record required fresh consideration, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration of the taxable classification and the notification claim in accordance with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>