<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 302 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205867</link>
    <description>Recognition under the National Council for Teacher Education Act and the 2007 Regulations was a statutory precondition for conducting the D.Ed. course, and institutions that misrepresented their recognised status were denied discretionary relief because they had secured interim orders by suppressing material facts. The Court also held that admissions made by unrecognised institutions could not be regularised, as Section 17-A and Regulation 8(12) barred student admissions without recognition. Validation of such admissions would undermine the statutory scheme and public interest, even if the students were not personally responsible for the misrepresentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 302 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205867</link>
      <description>Recognition under the National Council for Teacher Education Act and the 2007 Regulations was a statutory precondition for conducting the D.Ed. course, and institutions that misrepresented their recognised status were denied discretionary relief because they had secured interim orders by suppressing material facts. The Court also held that admissions made by unrecognised institutions could not be regularised, as Section 17-A and Regulation 8(12) barred student admissions without recognition. Validation of such admissions would undermine the statutory scheme and public interest, even if the students were not personally responsible for the misrepresentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>