<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 53 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205855</link>
    <description>The court quashed the Chief Commissioner&#039;s orders and granted the petitioners a waiver of interest under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act, amounting to Rs. 2,25,000. Additionally, the court directed the immediate return of the seized jewellery valued at Rs. 4,49,255, imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000 per month for any delays in returning the assets. The judgment emphasized the need for tax authorities to provide reasoned decisions and timely action in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 53 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205855</link>
      <description>The court quashed the Chief Commissioner&#039;s orders and granted the petitioners a waiver of interest under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act, amounting to Rs. 2,25,000. Additionally, the court directed the immediate return of the seized jewellery valued at Rs. 4,49,255, imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000 per month for any delays in returning the assets. The judgment emphasized the need for tax authorities to provide reasoned decisions and timely action in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>