<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 549 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205852</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow service charges as business expenditure paid by the assessee to its holding company. The Tribunal emphasized the authenticity of the agreement, lack of evidence of a collusive arrangement, and consistency with previous rulings. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the service charges&#039; deductibility based on turnover allocation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 549 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205852</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow service charges as business expenditure paid by the assessee to its holding company. The Tribunal emphasized the authenticity of the agreement, lack of evidence of a collusive arrangement, and consistency with previous rulings. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the service charges&#039; deductibility based on turnover allocation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>