<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 733 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205849</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s findings on the validity of service of notices, justification of assessment under Section 144, addition of undisclosed income, rejection of the peak credit theory, and the sufficiency of opportunity provided to the appellant. The Court found no substantial question of law involved and summarily dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 733 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205849</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s findings on the validity of service of notices, justification of assessment under Section 144, addition of undisclosed income, rejection of the peak credit theory, and the sufficiency of opportunity provided to the appellant. The Court found no substantial question of law involved and summarily dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>