<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 237 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205842</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal, finding no evidence supporting the revocation of the Customs House Agent&#039;s (CHA) license. It noted the CHA&#039;s request for the department to conduct the initial goods examination, indicating no intent to misdeclare. The Tribunal concluded that there was no independent evidence of wrongdoing by the CHA, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 237 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205842</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal, finding no evidence supporting the revocation of the Customs House Agent&#039;s (CHA) license. It noted the CHA&#039;s request for the department to conduct the initial goods examination, indicating no intent to misdeclare. The Tribunal concluded that there was no independent evidence of wrongdoing by the CHA, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>