<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 442 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205827</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the matter was remitted back to the Commissioner Appeal for a decision on the merits, considering the appeal to be filed within the permissible time frame. The court emphasized the importance of timely communication of orders and the right to a fair appeal process. The decision did not delve into the merits of the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, directing the Commissioner Appeal to decide independently within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 442 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205827</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the matter was remitted back to the Commissioner Appeal for a decision on the merits, considering the appeal to be filed within the permissible time frame. The court emphasized the importance of timely communication of orders and the right to a fair appeal process. The decision did not delve into the merits of the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, directing the Commissioner Appeal to decide independently within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>