<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 46 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205801</link>
    <description>HC upheld constitutional validity of the service tax provisions taxing letting/leasing of immovable property, ruling the levy targets an activity (commercial letting) rather than a tax on land/buildings under Entry 49, and therefore falls within Entry 97 (residuary) of List I. The court held that value addition and service element attract service tax. The earlier HC decision in the first Home Solution case was overruled. Parliament&#039;s retrospective amendment to cure that deficiency was held permissible, validating the tax&#039;s retrospective operation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 46 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205801</link>
      <description>HC upheld constitutional validity of the service tax provisions taxing letting/leasing of immovable property, ruling the levy targets an activity (commercial letting) rather than a tax on land/buildings under Entry 49, and therefore falls within Entry 97 (residuary) of List I. The court held that value addition and service element attract service tax. The earlier HC decision in the first Home Solution case was overruled. Parliament&#039;s retrospective amendment to cure that deficiency was held permissible, validating the tax&#039;s retrospective operation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>