<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 638 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205792</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that duty draw back income accrued upon verification and quantification by the competent authority, not at the time of export. Regarding the disallowance of personal use of cars by directors under section 38(2) of the Income-tax Act, the Court dismissed the application due to the minimal amount involved, Rs. 15,000, deeming it insignificant for reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 638 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205792</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that duty draw back income accrued upon verification and quantification by the competent authority, not at the time of export. Regarding the disallowance of personal use of cars by directors under section 38(2) of the Income-tax Act, the Court dismissed the application due to the minimal amount involved, Rs. 15,000, deeming it insignificant for reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>