<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 682 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205791</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It held that Section 50 does not apply to land, and the land and building should be treated as separate assets for the purposes of capital gains computation. The Tribunal also revised the allocation of the sale consideration, resulting in a short-term capital gain for the building and equipment and a long-term capital loss for the land.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 682 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205791</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It held that Section 50 does not apply to land, and the land and building should be treated as separate assets for the purposes of capital gains computation. The Tribunal also revised the allocation of the sale consideration, resulting in a short-term capital gain for the building and equipment and a long-term capital loss for the land.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>