https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205788 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's non-compliance with the stay order issued under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite multiple opportunities, the appellant failed to deposit the required amount or provide evidence of challenging the order in the High Court. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely compliance and noted the absence of supporting documentation for the appellant's claims. As a result, the appeal was dismissed for failure to adhere to the provisions of the Act and the Tribunal's stay order. en-us Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205788 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's non-compliance with the stay order issued under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite multiple opportunities, the appellant failed to deposit the required amount or provide evidence of challenging the order in the High Court. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely compliance and noted the absence of supporting documentation for the appellant's claims. As a result, the appeal was dismissed for failure to adhere to the provisions of the Act and the Tribunal's stay order. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205788