https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205780 The Tribunal set aside the demand raised against the appellant for alleged less production and payment of duty, citing lack of corroborative evidence to support the Revenue's claims of clandestine activities. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence for charges of clandestine removal, highlighting the absence of proof of procurement of raw materials and actual manufacture and clearance. As a result, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with consequential relief granted. en-us Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205780 The Tribunal set aside the demand raised against the appellant for alleged less production and payment of duty, citing lack of corroborative evidence to support the Revenue's claims of clandestine activities. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence for charges of clandestine removal, highlighting the absence of proof of procurement of raw materials and actual manufacture and clearance. As a result, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with consequential relief granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205780