<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 435 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205779</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty and interest demand but set aside the penalty in a case concerning the claim of credit for MS Plates, Sheets, Channels, and HR Sheets as capital goods. The items were found not to qualify as capital goods under the strict interpretation of the law due to their specific usage for fabricating tubes or keeping hot drawn wires, rather than for machinery falling under the definition of capital goods. The judgment highlighted the importance of the precise usage of items in relation to machinery fabrication to be eligible for credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 435 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205779</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty and interest demand but set aside the penalty in a case concerning the claim of credit for MS Plates, Sheets, Channels, and HR Sheets as capital goods. The items were found not to qualify as capital goods under the strict interpretation of the law due to their specific usage for fabricating tubes or keeping hot drawn wires, rather than for machinery falling under the definition of capital goods. The judgment highlighted the importance of the precise usage of items in relation to machinery fabrication to be eligible for credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>