<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 686 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially accepted the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The deletion of Rs. 10 lakhs as undisclosed income was remanded back to the AO for fresh consideration. The deletion of Rs. 5.75 lakhs as undisclosed income was upheld based on the majority opinion. The levy of surcharge was restored in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 686 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially accepted the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The deletion of Rs. 10 lakhs as undisclosed income was remanded back to the AO for fresh consideration. The deletion of Rs. 5.75 lakhs as undisclosed income was upheld based on the majority opinion. The levy of surcharge was restored in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>