<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 632 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205753</link>
    <description>Passports seized during an ongoing investigation may be returned when there is no allegation of tampering or of any offence relating to the passports themselves, if suitable safeguards can protect the inquiry. The Madras HC treated continued custody as unnecessary where the seizure was only to prevent departure from the country without the investigating agency&#039;s knowledge. It accepted the prosecution&#039;s safeguard that the petitioners provide advance intimation of departure, destination and expected return date, and directed return of the passports subject to an undertaking by petitioners 1 to 5 to notify the investigating officer before leaving India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 632 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205753</link>
      <description>Passports seized during an ongoing investigation may be returned when there is no allegation of tampering or of any offence relating to the passports themselves, if suitable safeguards can protect the inquiry. The Madras HC treated continued custody as unnecessary where the seizure was only to prevent departure from the country without the investigating agency&#039;s knowledge. It accepted the prosecution&#039;s safeguard that the petitioners provide advance intimation of departure, destination and expected return date, and directed return of the passports subject to an undertaking by petitioners 1 to 5 to notify the investigating officer before leaving India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>