<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 632 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205748</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals, affirming that the expenditure on repair and maintenance expenses on the furnace and the cost of moulds used in the manufacturing process were revenue expenditures, not capital expenditures. The judgment emphasized the need to analyze the specific facts of each case to determine the nature of expenditure, considering whether it results in the acquisition of a new asset or is incurred in the regular course of business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 632 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205748</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals, affirming that the expenditure on repair and maintenance expenses on the furnace and the cost of moulds used in the manufacturing process were revenue expenditures, not capital expenditures. The judgment emphasized the need to analyze the specific facts of each case to determine the nature of expenditure, considering whether it results in the acquisition of a new asset or is incurred in the regular course of business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>