<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 612 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals due to lack of COD approval, partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on depreciation, and remanded various issues to the AO for re-examination. The decision highlighted the significance of COD approval and the interpretation of &quot;used&quot; concerning depreciation claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2016 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 612 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals due to lack of COD approval, partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on depreciation, and remanded various issues to the AO for re-examination. The decision highlighted the significance of COD approval and the interpretation of &quot;used&quot; concerning depreciation claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>