https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205731 The court dismissed the writ petition, highlighting that challenging a final order like Ext. P6 through Article 226 of the Constitution after the appeal period lapses is impermissible as it would resurrect a time-barred cause of action. The petitioner's failure to file an appeal or take any action against Ext. P6 within the prescribed time resulted in the loss of the right to appeal. The court emphasized that allowing challenges under Article 226 at a later stage would enable litigants to revive time-barred causes of action, leading to the dismissal of the petition. en-us Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205731 The court dismissed the writ petition, highlighting that challenging a final order like Ext. P6 through Article 226 of the Constitution after the appeal period lapses is impermissible as it would resurrect a time-barred cause of action. The petitioner's failure to file an appeal or take any action against Ext. P6 within the prescribed time resulted in the loss of the right to appeal. The court emphasized that allowing challenges under Article 226 at a later stage would enable litigants to revive time-barred causes of action, leading to the dismissal of the petition. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205731