<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 187 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205720</link>
    <description>Refund of Service Tax on terminal handling charges and bill of lading charges was held admissible under Notification No. 41/2007-ST. CESTAT noted that the show cause notice challenged only the alleged lack of authorisation of the port service provider, so the Revenue could not raise a new classification objection for the first time in appeal. The Tribunal also followed its earlier view that refund cannot be denied merely because port services were rendered without authorisation by the port. The Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected and the refund claim was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 187 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205720</link>
      <description>Refund of Service Tax on terminal handling charges and bill of lading charges was held admissible under Notification No. 41/2007-ST. CESTAT noted that the show cause notice challenged only the alleged lack of authorisation of the port service provider, so the Revenue could not raise a new classification objection for the first time in appeal. The Tribunal also followed its earlier view that refund cannot be denied merely because port services were rendered without authorisation by the port. The Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected and the refund claim was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>