<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 610 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205715</link>
    <description>Where only the company&#039;s name changes and its constitution remains the same, transfer of unutilised Cenvat credit is legally permissible under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s claim to carry forward the credit from the erstwhile name was accepted, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge on penalty did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 610 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205715</link>
      <description>Where only the company&#039;s name changes and its constitution remains the same, transfer of unutilised Cenvat credit is legally permissible under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s claim to carry forward the credit from the erstwhile name was accepted, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge on penalty did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>