<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 417 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205713</link>
    <description>The court emphasized that goods cannot be detained indefinitely without a valid order under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962. It highlighted the importance of adhering to legal procedures and timelines in detaining goods for investigation. The court directed the immediate release of the consignments if no show cause notice under Section 124(a) is issued within the specified period, underscoring the need for lawful authority in detention cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 417 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205713</link>
      <description>The court emphasized that goods cannot be detained indefinitely without a valid order under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962. It highlighted the importance of adhering to legal procedures and timelines in detaining goods for investigation. The court directed the immediate release of the consignments if no show cause notice under Section 124(a) is issued within the specified period, underscoring the need for lawful authority in detention cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>