<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 21 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205705</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, ruling that Section 234D of the Income Tax Act was not applicable to the case as no refunds were granted under Section 143(1) of the Act. The Court emphasized that Section 234D only applies when refunds granted under Section 143(1) become refundable to the Revenue on regular assessment. The decision did not address the retrospective application of Section 234D, leaving that question open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 14:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 21 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205705</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, ruling that Section 234D of the Income Tax Act was not applicable to the case as no refunds were granted under Section 143(1) of the Act. The Court emphasized that Section 234D only applies when refunds granted under Section 143(1) become refundable to the Revenue on regular assessment. The decision did not address the retrospective application of Section 234D, leaving that question open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>