<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 683 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205694</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order in favor of the respondent, a manufacturer of cotton yarn, regarding the utilization of Cenvat credit for Service tax payment. The Court found that the respondent, deemed providers of GTA services for raw material transportation, could rightfully use the credit as per Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Court rejected the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming that there was no prohibition against using credit for Service tax payment by deemed service providers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 683 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205694</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order in favor of the respondent, a manufacturer of cotton yarn, regarding the utilization of Cenvat credit for Service tax payment. The Court found that the respondent, deemed providers of GTA services for raw material transportation, could rightfully use the credit as per Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Court rejected the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming that there was no prohibition against using credit for Service tax payment by deemed service providers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>