<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 397 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205689</link>
    <description>Clearances made under two separate small-scale exemption notifications were not required to be clubbed for computing the first-clearance limit. The Tribunal noted that the appellants had availed concessional duty under Notification No. 8/99-CE and Notification No. 10/99-CE for different products, and that later decisions had correctly held that clearances under one notification need not be counted while applying the first-clearance condition under the other. The issue was treated as settled and no longer res integra. The demand and penalty were therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 397 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205689</link>
      <description>Clearances made under two separate small-scale exemption notifications were not required to be clubbed for computing the first-clearance limit. The Tribunal noted that the appellants had availed concessional duty under Notification No. 8/99-CE and Notification No. 10/99-CE for different products, and that later decisions had correctly held that clearances under one notification need not be counted while applying the first-clearance condition under the other. The issue was treated as settled and no longer res integra. The demand and penalty were therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>