https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205688 The judgment clarified the requirements of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, emphasizing the need for specific directions in adjudicating orders. The appellants' failure to comply with the directive to deposit duty led to the dismissal of their appeals. The Tribunal ruled that objections to deposit under Section 35F only apply when the challenged order mandates a payment. As the orders in question did not quantify any specific amount due from the appellants, they were not obligated to deposit any amount. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to set aside the previous order and decide on the appeals' merits promptly. en-us Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205688 The judgment clarified the requirements of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, emphasizing the need for specific directions in adjudicating orders. The appellants' failure to comply with the directive to deposit duty led to the dismissal of their appeals. The Tribunal ruled that objections to deposit under Section 35F only apply when the challenged order mandates a payment. As the orders in question did not quantify any specific amount due from the appellants, they were not obligated to deposit any amount. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to set aside the previous order and decide on the appeals' merits promptly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205688