<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 638 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205687</link>
    <description>Rectification under section 35C(2) is confined to mistakes apparent from the record in final orders passed under section 35C(1), and it cannot be used to reopen an interim or miscellaneous order. A Miscellaneous Application seeking to alter an earlier miscellaneous order was therefore treated as an impermissible attempt to secure review-like relief, which the Tribunal does not possess. The Tribunal also noted that a Bench must follow the ratio of the jurisdictional High Court in preference to a contrary tribunal view. On that basis, the rectification application was held not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 638 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205687</link>
      <description>Rectification under section 35C(2) is confined to mistakes apparent from the record in final orders passed under section 35C(1), and it cannot be used to reopen an interim or miscellaneous order. A Miscellaneous Application seeking to alter an earlier miscellaneous order was therefore treated as an impermissible attempt to secure review-like relief, which the Tribunal does not possess. The Tribunal also noted that a Bench must follow the ratio of the jurisdictional High Court in preference to a contrary tribunal view. On that basis, the rectification application was held not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>