<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 400 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205662</link>
    <description>HC upheld CESTAT&#039;s view that CENVAT credit for cement and TMT bars used in constructing warehouses for storage and warehousing services was valid, finding the original authority and appellate authority erred. Service tax liability is governed by the Finance Act and Service Tax Rules, and providers are entitled to input service credit. Because there was no finding of suppression or irregular claim, imposition of penalty under Rule 15(2) was improper and was rightly set aside. The two appeals are dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 400 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205662</link>
      <description>HC upheld CESTAT&#039;s view that CENVAT credit for cement and TMT bars used in constructing warehouses for storage and warehousing services was valid, finding the original authority and appellate authority erred. Service tax liability is governed by the Finance Act and Service Tax Rules, and providers are entitled to input service credit. Because there was no finding of suppression or irregular claim, imposition of penalty under Rule 15(2) was improper and was rightly set aside. The two appeals are dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>