<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 164 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205644</link>
    <description>The High Court held that interest and penalty can be imposed even if excise duty is deposited before the Show Cause Notice is issued. The Court emphasized that penalty imposition hinges on facts and directed the Commissioner to reassess the penalty issue considering fraud, collusion, misrepresentation, or contravention of Excise Act provisions. The Court remanded the case for fresh determination. Additionally, the Court instructed the Tribunal to reconsider the penalty imposition question based on fraud, collusion, misrepresentation, or contravention of Excise Act provisions in line with previous decisions, ultimately disposing of the appeal accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 164 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205644</link>
      <description>The High Court held that interest and penalty can be imposed even if excise duty is deposited before the Show Cause Notice is issued. The Court emphasized that penalty imposition hinges on facts and directed the Commissioner to reassess the penalty issue considering fraud, collusion, misrepresentation, or contravention of Excise Act provisions. The Court remanded the case for fresh determination. Additionally, the Court instructed the Tribunal to reconsider the penalty imposition question based on fraud, collusion, misrepresentation, or contravention of Excise Act provisions in line with previous decisions, ultimately disposing of the appeal accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>