<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 612 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205633</link>
    <description>Depreciation on computer peripherals and accessories depends on item-wise examination of whether each item functions independently or forms an integral part of the computer system, so the claim was remitted for fresh factual verification. Royalty paid under a technical collaboration agreement was treated as revenue expenditure because it was a recurring, sales-linked payment for limited use of know-how without transfer of proprietary rights, and the disallowance was deleted. Expenditure on a secure landfill system and allied works was also held to be revenue in nature because it was incurred to meet environmental and pollution-control obligations necessary for business operations, so the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 612 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205633</link>
      <description>Depreciation on computer peripherals and accessories depends on item-wise examination of whether each item functions independently or forms an integral part of the computer system, so the claim was remitted for fresh factual verification. Royalty paid under a technical collaboration agreement was treated as revenue expenditure because it was a recurring, sales-linked payment for limited use of know-how without transfer of proprietary rights, and the disallowance was deleted. Expenditure on a secure landfill system and allied works was also held to be revenue in nature because it was incurred to meet environmental and pollution-control obligations necessary for business operations, so the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>