<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 540 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205616</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the stay application, emphasizing the need to consider specific conditions and distinctions between imported and domestically manufactured goods when applying exemption benefits under relevant notifications. The decision highlighted the importance of assessing compliance requirements under different Acts for imported and domestically produced goods to determine eligibility for exemption benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 540 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205616</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the stay application, emphasizing the need to consider specific conditions and distinctions between imported and domestically manufactured goods when applying exemption benefits under relevant notifications. The decision highlighted the importance of assessing compliance requirements under different Acts for imported and domestically produced goods to determine eligibility for exemption benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>