<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 539 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205615</link>
    <description>The appeal involved valuation issues regarding refundable deposits collected by the assessee from consumers of &#039;Bisleri&#039; water. The bench emphasized the need for proper verification of facts and compliance with circulars. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was remanded for fresh consideration based on the circular&#039;s clarification on the cost of reusable containers. The judgment underscored the importance of independent verification of certificates and compliance with relevant provisions, instructing the Commissioner to conduct thorough audits and provide the assessee with a fair hearing opportunity before making a decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 539 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205615</link>
      <description>The appeal involved valuation issues regarding refundable deposits collected by the assessee from consumers of &#039;Bisleri&#039; water. The bench emphasized the need for proper verification of facts and compliance with circulars. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was remanded for fresh consideration based on the circular&#039;s clarification on the cost of reusable containers. The judgment underscored the importance of independent verification of certificates and compliance with relevant provisions, instructing the Commissioner to conduct thorough audits and provide the assessee with a fair hearing opportunity before making a decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>